In the 1940s in France, a group of priests set out to find
out what life was like for the industrial working class. Working class church
attendance was very low and these priests wanted to know why. They quit parish
ministry and took up jobs as factory workers, making their living alongside
everyone else at the factory and writing to their bishops about the conditions
of workers. Many of them became actively involved in union organizing. Others
worked hard to raise up church leadership from the working class itself.
Much has changed since the 1940s. In Europe and the U.S.,
there are few factories left in which to work. In a post-industrial society,
working class people now overwhelmingly work in a low wage service based
economy—as Wal Mart greeters, hair stylists, part time truck drivers,
housecleaners, and office workers. I think of this as I do ministry in a blue
collar town and support myself (barely) while grooming dogs. If the worker priests of yesteryear wished to
understand the lives of working class people today, I would invite them to
groom dogs or to take much less stable jobs in a fragmented and non-organized
context (which, I am told, some European priests have done). The struggles and stresses of life on the edge are profound.
Probably 65% of Americans are working class, but most of
them are not blue collar industrial workers and a good number of them are
living on the edge. And, just as the French church recognized was the case in
the 1940s, the U.S. working class, especially the white working class, is not
very likely to attend church.
What sacrifices might the church and its ministers in the 21st
century be willing to make in order to ask why? In order to find the church
anew among a post-industrial, deeply fragmented people?
No comments:
Post a Comment